Groom Library
  What's New About Groom Practice Groups Attorneys The Groom Library HOME
     
  Litigation  
     
 
• Health Care
 
• 9th Cir Holds ERISA Does Not Preempt SF Health Care Security Ordinance (10/02/08)
• Federal Courts Appear to Disagree on Whether ERISA Preempts State and Local Health Reform Laws (3/12/08)
• Supreme Court Issues Decision in Favor Of Groom Client in Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. (5/26/06)
• Brief of Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. in Opposition to Petitioners' Writ of Certiorari (PDF,144kb)
• Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila (7/29/2004)
• Groom Law Group files Amicus Curiae brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to grant certiorari in Aetna Health Inc., v. Davila (10/17/2003)
• Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller (4/18/2003)
• Groom Law Group Files Amicus Curiae Brief in Supreme Court Treating Physician Rule Case (3/25/2003)
• Erie County Retiree Health ADEA Litigation Settles -- Be Careful What the EEOC Once Asked For (4/30/2002)
• Groom Law Group Files Amici Curiae Brief to the Supreme Court of Alabama (4/1/2002)
• Eleventh Circuit Preemption Decisions (2/4/2002)
• District Court Holds on Remand that Erie County's Retiree Health Program Flunks ADEA's (7/1/2001)
• Pennsylvania Supreme Court finds that State Law Claims Against Plan Decision-Makers for (7/1/2001)
• Title VII Prohibits Exclusion of Prescription Contraceptives from Comprehensive Prescription Coverage under Employer's Health Plan. (7/1/2001)
• Amicus brief on Alta Health & Life Ins. v. Gilbert, prepared by Groom Law Group (4/1/2001)
• Evidentiary Scope of Judicial Review of Discretionary Employee Benefit Plan Decisions (A Circuit-By-Circuit Review) (4/1/2001)
• Eleventh Circuit Rejects Plan's Interpretation on Provider Discounts (3/1/2001)
   
• Other
 
• Courts Divide on Fiduciary Status of 401(k) Plan Service Providers (10/06/08)
• Updated - 401(k) Fee Litigation (9/15/08)
•

Class Certification Denied in 401(k) Service Provider Fee Case (8/29/08)
• Class Certified in 401(k) Fee Case (7/22/08)
• Supreme Court Gives "Green Light" to ERISA Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims Related to Individual 401(k) Participant Accounts (2/26/08)
• Sixth Cir Rules for Groom Client in Enforcing Arbitration Provision (1/29/08)
• Third Circuit Issues Decision in Favor of Groom Client in Top Hat Plan Lawsuit (6/9/06)
• Class Action Lawsuits Target Fee Arrangements (10/20/06)
• Split in Recent Cash Balance Rulings (5/16/06)
• Recent Cash Balance Decisions Pose Limited Threat to Governmental Cash Balance Plans (1/9/2004)
• Enron Corp. Summary of September 30, 2003 Ruling (10/3/2003)
• Court Upholds Plan’s Rules Restricting Frequent Trading of Individual Plan Accounts (4/18/2003)
• The Role of 401(k) Professional Administrators and Recordkeepers after Enron (11/1/2002)
• Defined Benefit Plan Breach of Fiduciary Duties Under ERISA (4/15/2002)
• Employer Securities Issues After ENRON (3/4/2002)
• Supreme Court's Subrogation Decision (1/10/2002)
• Courts Focus on DC Plan Investments in Employer Stock (12/20/2001)
• Troubling 9th Circuit Decision Expands Anti-Cutback Rule to Protect Future Accruals (10/23/2001)
 
     
 
 
     
     
  While we hope that you find materials on the Groom Law Group web site to be informative, please note all of these materials are provided to readers for informational purposes only and you may not rely on this information as legal or any other advice on any matter to you. These materials may not reflect the most current legal developments and should in no way be taken as an indication of future legal results. Further, our transmission of information on this web site is not intended to create, and your receipt of this information does not create, an attorney client relationship between Groom Law Group. Accordingly, you should not act on any information provided without consulting competent counsel.

Please keep in mind that merely contacting us (whether by e-mail, telephone, regular mail or otherwise) will not establish an attorney-client relationship. We cannot represent any person until we confirm that there would not be a conflict of interest and that we are otherwise able to accept an engagement. Therefore, please do not send us any confidential information or documents until we have established an attorney-client relationship in writing because your information or documents will not be protected as privileged or protected information. Please also note that any information that you provide to us by email may not be secure.

  
     
  What's New About Groom Practice Groups Attorneys The Groom Library HOME
© 2007 Groom Law Group, Chartered. All rights reserved. Legal Disclaimer

Search • Primary Contacts