Each week while Congress is in session, our Policy team delivers a key update to highlight a topical benefits, health, or retirement news item from the Hill, such as a newly introduced bill, a summary of a committee hearing, or another hot-button matter.
The latest continuing resolution (“CR”) that expires in mid-March would have included significant PBM reforms that, although they did not become law in 2024, will likely be reconsidered by Congress in the future.
Specifically, the legislation would have included the following policy changes:
- Transparency. The legislation would have required PBMs to provide semi-annual reports to group health plans that included, among other things, detailed information about drugs on the formulary, utilization, and benefit design features that encourage the use of the PBM’s affiliates. The legislation included a penalty of up to $10,000 per day for failing to provide the required information.
- Rebate Pass Through. The legislation would have amended section 408(b)(2)(B) of ERISA to render any new contract or contract renewal unreasonable unless the PBM passes through 100% of the rebates, fees, alternative discounts, and other remuneration received from certain entities, including drug manufacturers and rebate aggregators. Payments were required to made on a quarterly basis, and plans and issuers were provided rights to audit rebates.
- Fee Disclosure. The legislation included a sense of Congress aimed at clarifying the application of the brokerage and consulting compensation disclosure provisions of Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021. In particular, the provision would have clarified the applicability of the rules to consulting arrangements.
- Prohibited Transactions. The legislation would have amended section 406(a) of ERISA to specify that a plan’s contract with a service provider, including a health insurance issuer, under which the service provider has a separate contractual agreement with a PBM to provide PBM services to the plan, will be considered an indirect furnishing of goods, services or facilities between the plan and the PBM acting as the party in interest.
These provisions have bipartisan backing and support from at least some employer groups.